SAASPOCALYPSEcase · head-to-head
wedge comparison
subjects of investigation
asana.comvsokta.com
which is stronger?
→vs←
clone time
3 months
fortress3 months
okta.com
enterprise identity & access management platform
26/ 100
wedge scorefull report ↗
moat
how deep is each moat.
asana.com · aggregate
4.5/10shallow moat
moat delta+2.9
okta.com · aggregate
7.4/10deep moat
4.0
capital+4.0 →
8.0
3.0
technical+2.0 →
5.0
4.0
network+2.0 →
6.0
5.0
switching+2.0 →
7.0
2.0
data+4.0 →
6.0
2.0
regulatory+7.0 →
9.0
8.2
distribution+1.5 →
9.7
floor
cost + time, side by side.
monthly floortie
asana.com
$47
okta.com
$47 + usage
monthly floor is roughly the same on both sides.
time to cloneasana.com wins
asana.com
8 weeks
okta.com
3 months
delta −2× faster8 weeks vs. 3 months.
overlap
where they fight, where they don't.
features only one ships, plus the small middle they share.
only asana.com · 44
serverless / edge platformautomationsdeveloper ecosystemrole-based access control
shared · 33
audit logversion history & creative timelinesso (saml/oidc)
only okta.com · 33
hipaa compliancellm inferencesocial login
stack
what they're built on.
shared infra and the differentiating bits.
only asana.com · 55
dnd-kitNetlifypartykitReactTrigger.dev
shared infra · 77
CloudflareNext.jsPostgresCloudflare R2ResendSupabaseVercel
only okta.com · 66
FastlyGitHubLuciaNextAuthSentrySupabase Auth
the verdict
ATTACK ASANA FIRST
same comparison surface, two different walls. give the asana attack a month. circle back to okta only if you genuinely need what it does that the other doesn't.
the case
a full tier easiershallower moat
full reportcontested · 55
→ read the asana.com report
full reportfortress · 26
→ read the okta.com report
← saaspocalypse · directoryhead-to-head