SAASPOCALYPSEcase · head-to-head
wedge comparison
subjects of investigation

atlassian.comvsloom.com

which is stronger?

clone time
10–16 weeks
contested

atlassian.com

team collaboration & project management suite

36/ 100
wedge scorefull report ↗
clone time
6 weeks
contested

loom.com

async screen recording & video messaging

61/ 100
wedge scorefull report ↗
moat

how deep is each moat.

atlassian.com · aggregate
6.4/10real moat
moat delta-2.5
loom.com · aggregate
3.9/10shallow moat
6.0
capital-2.0 →
4.0
6.0
technical-1.0 →
5.0
7.0
network-4.0 →
3.0
7.0
switching-3.0 →
4.0
4.0
data±0
4.0
4.0
regulatory-2.0 →
2.0
9.2
distribution-4.7 →
4.5
floor

cost + time, side by side.

monthly floorloom.com wins
atlassian.com
$47
loom.com
$42 + usage
delta +$5loom.com costs less per month to keep the lights on.
time to cloneloom.com wins
atlassian.com
10–16 weeks
loom.com
6 weeks
delta −3× faster6 weeks vs. 10–16 weeks.
overlap

where they fight, where they don't.

features only one ships, plus the small middle they share.
only atlassian.com · 44
issue / project trackerautomationsrole-based access controlrich text editor
shared · 22
comments & mentionssocial login
only loom.com · 33
screen recordingspeech-to-textvideo transcoding
stack

what they're built on.

shared infra and the differentiating bits.
only atlassian.com · 33
LoopsReactTiptap
shared infra · 99
CloudflareCloudFrontGitHubNext.jsPostgresCloudflare R2ResendSupabaseVercel
only loom.com · 77
Cloudflare PagesElectronMuxOpenAIS3SentryTauri
the verdict
ATTACK LOOM FIRST

same comparison surface, two different walls. give the loom attack a month. circle back to atlassian only if you genuinely need what it does that the other doesn't.

the case
cheaper at the floorshallower moat
read the loom report →
full reportcontested · 36
→ read the atlassian.com report
full reportcontested · 61
→ read the loom.com report