SAASPOCALYPSEcase · head-to-head
wedge comparison
subjects of investigation
github.comvsharness.io
which is stronger?
→vs←
moat
how deep is each moat.
github.com · aggregate
8.0/10deep moat
moat delta-2.4
harness.io · aggregate
5.6/10real moat
8.0
capital-1.0 →
7.0
8.0
technical-3.0 →
5.0
10.0
network-8.0 →
2.0
8.0
switching-2.0 →
6.0
7.0
data-4.0 →
3.0
6.0
regulatory+2.0 →
8.0
8.2
distribution—
—
floor
cost + time, side by side.
monthly floorgithub.com wins
github.com
$26 + usage
harness.io
$46
delta −$20github.com costs less per month to keep the lights on.
time to cloneharness.io wins
github.com
∞
harness.io
8 weeks
delta · finite vs. ∞harness.io is buildable; github.com effectively isn't.
overlap
where they fight, where they don't.
features only one ships, plus the small middle they share.
only github.com · 22
version history & creative timelinemarketplace
shared · 44
integrationssocial loginsso (saml/oidc)webhooks
only harness.io · 00
harness.io is a strict subset of the shared surface.
stack
what they're built on.
shared infra and the differentiating bits.
only github.com · 55
AxiomCloudflare WorkersFly.ioRenderSentry
shared infra · 55
CloudflareGitHubPostgresCloudflare R2S3
only harness.io · 1010
AWSAzureCloudflare PagesGoogle CloudNext.jsPostmarkResendSupabaseVercelWebflow
the verdict
ATTACK HARNESS FIRST
same comparison surface, two different walls. give the harness attack a month. circle back to github only if you genuinely need what it does that the other doesn't.
the case
a full tier easiershallower moat
full reportfortress · 20
→ read the github.com report
full reportcontested · 44
→ read the harness.io report
← saaspocalypse · directoryhead-to-head